Resources

In a Richmond Times-Dispatch guest column, GMU Professors James Finkelstein and Judith Wilde argue that UVA’s Board of Visitors appointed President Scott Beardsley under questionable circumstances and note that his contract could require up to $8.5 million in payouts if a future board tries to remove him. The authors call this a “poison pill” that makes correcting a disputed appointment financially prohibitive, contending that it creates governance paralysis and insulates the BOV from accountability.

The Washington Post reports that Governor Abigail Spanberger moved quickly upon taking office to appoint 10 new members to UVA’s Board of Visitors—filling vacancies left after several Youngkin-era board members resigned.

The Cavalier Daily reports that 201 UVA faculty members have publicly called for Scott Beardsley’s presidential appointment to be rescinded, arguing in a statement that the Board of Visitors acted with disregard for procedure, transparency, and stakeholder input. The faculty statement, sent to the Board of Visitors and published as a guest letter by The Cavalier Daily, alleges political interference, rushed decision-making, and a lack of proper vetting, and urges the board to restart the presidential search process.

The Cavalier Daily’s Editorial Board urges incoming President Scott Beardsley to lead with empathy, transparency, and a renewed focus on UVA’s educational mission amid concerns of politicization, corporatization, and federal overreach. The editorial calls for genuine engagement with students and faculty, clear communication, and a willingness to defend university values and stakeholders against external political pressures.

The Virginia Mercury reports that Virginia state senators pressed then-UVA BOV Rector Rachel Sheridan, then-Vice-Rector Porter Wilkinson and President Scott Beardsley at a meeting held ahead of the opening of the 2026 General Assembly to explain the University’s signing of the controversial DOJ agreement. Lawmakers also questioned the board’s expedited appointment of Scott Beardsley as president despite calls from Governor-elect Abigail Spanberger to delay doing so until new board members were seated.

In a letter published by the Augusta Free Press, George Mason Professors Judith Wilde and James Finkelstein argue that the controversy over Scott Beardsley’s appointment as UVA president is about failures of transparency and academic due diligence, missing information that a more thorough process and vetting would have found.

In a review of nearly 1,000 pages of text messages obtained through an open records request, The Washington Post reports that UVA board members, coordinating with the office of then-Governor Glenn Youngkin, privately strategized with each other to dismantle DEI initiatives and restrict gender transition care at UVA.

The Daily Progress reports that John Harris—a major donor and former Carlyle Group colleague of then-Governor Youngkin—has been appointed as a nonvoting member of the UVA Health System Board after being blocked by Senate Democrats from joining UVA’s Board of Visitors.

Inside Higher Ed reports that Scott Beardsley’s appointment as UVA president has sparked controversy over the process, not his credentials. The Republican-led Board of Visitors, with five vacancies after democratic lawmakers blocked several of Youngkin’s nominees, selected Beardsley despite calls from faculty, deans, and state leaders to pause the search until Democratic Governor-elect Abigail Spanberger took office and the board was fully constituted. Critics question the board’s legal authority and say shared governance was sidelined, while Democratic lawmakers and some conservatives have expressed distrust—Democrats over the process, and conservatives over Beardsley’s past support for DEI.

A new report from the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), led by Sen. Bernie Sanders, details a pattern of First Amendment violations by the Trump administration in 17 federal court cases involving higher education — including targeted actions against UVA. The report highlights how UVA, after President Jim Ryan’s resignation under pressure from the DOJ, was asked to sign the “Compact for Academic Excellence,” a federal mandate tying funding to restrictions on campus speech, hiring, and admissions. The report maintains that such tactics threaten the constitutional autonomy of universities nationwide and calls on institutions to actively defend their rights.

The University of Virginia chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP-UVA) published a letter scorning the appointment of Scott Beardsley as illegitimate, citing the Board of Visitors’ noncompliance with state law, lack of faculty input, and disregard for widespread calls to pause the search. The statement references widespread no-confidence votes, the ouster of President Ryan, and the BOV’s actions as undermining shared governance and academic freedom. AAUP-UVA urges the UVA community to reject the process and supports waiting until Governor-elect Spanberger can fill board vacancies and restore compliance.

President Emeritus of Columbia University Lee Bollinger warns that American universities face existential threats from growing federal and state authoritarianism, citing recent federal interventions — including that faced by UVA — that use funding leverage to force changes in university governance, DEI policies, and academic practices. He argues that traditional defenses for university autonomy are inadequate and urges universities to assert their constitutional role as a “fifth branch” of democracy. Bollinger calls for stronger legal protections, leadership committed to academic freedom, and broader public education about universities’ societal role.

Glenn Altschuler, emeritus professor at Cornell University, and David Wippman, emeritus president of Hamilton College, write an opinion piece in The Hill characterizing UVA as the clearest case of federal overreach in recent university-Trump administration settlements. The authors stress that UVA’s president must now personally certify compliance, subject to the Trump administration’s discretion, which they suggest reflects a sharp loss of institutional — and state — autonomy from the federal government.

The Washington Post reports that some conservatives are attacking the selection of Scott Beardsley as president because of his prior leadership of DEI initiatives at Darden. Beardsley’s CV has been edited to remove explicit references to diversity, the Post reports, in the wake of President Trump’s executive order and subsequent administration actions aimed at rooting out diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in higher education.

The Cavalier Daily Editorial Board criticizes UVA’s Board of Visitors for appointing Scott Beardsley as president during winter break, arguing the decision lacked transparency and excluded the university community. The editorial questions the board’s legal standing due to alleged noncompliance with state residency and alumni requirements and points to a broader pattern of unilateral and politicized actions, including Jim Ryan’s resignation and the handling of the presidential search. The board’s approach, The Cavalier Daily contends, has eroded stakeholder trust and left the new president facing legitimacy challenges from the outset.

In a guest column, George Mason University Professors Judith Wilde and James Finkelstein argue that the UVA Board of Visitors’ decision to appoint Scott Beardsley as president — despite unresolved legal disputes over board appointments and calls from Governor-elect Abigail Spanberger and campus leaders to pause the search — risks a legitimacy crisis for the University. They warn this could invite legal challenges, operational uncertainty, and weakened trust in governance, urging the incoming administration and legislature to restore compliance and public confidence.

The Washington Post reports that UVA’s Board of Visitors unanimously appointed Scott Beardsley, dean of the Darden School of Business, as the University’s 10th president. The decision, made by a heavily scrutinized board composed of Governor Youngkin’s appointees, prompted swift criticism from faculty, students, alumni, and state Democrats, who had urged the BOV to delay the decision until Governor-elect Abigail Spanberger could appoint new board members.

VPM reports that Interim President Paul Mahoney defended UVA’s controversial agreement with the DOJ in testimony before the Virginia Senate Finance Education Subcommittee, saying it was needed to avoid crippling sanctions and loss of research funding. Board of Visitors leaders Rector Rachel Sheridan and Vice Rector Porter Wilkinson were invited but did not attend the hearing.

A Chronicle of Higher Education investigation reveals that UVA’s faculty, staff, and students fiercely opposed the Trump administration’s “Compact,” with over 2,000 survey responses dominated by emphatic refusals. Respondents cited fears over academic freedom, institutional autonomy, and federal overreach—especially in reference to the recent resignation of President Ryan.

In an opinion piece in The Hill, Austin Sarat, Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College, describes unprecedented federal and state intervention at UVA — including demands for Jim Ryan’s resignation — as part of a broader campaign to reduce racial diversity and impose ideological constraints on higher education.

Former Associated Press reporter Bob Lewis, writing for the Virginia Mercury, argues that aggressive partisan interference from both state and federal leaders — including forced resignations of university presidents and efforts to dismantle diversity programs — now threatens the reputation and stability of Virginia’s nationally ranked public universities. Lewis writes that political power struggles over board appointments and leadership at UVA, GMU, and VMI have created chaos, undermined institutional autonomy, and risked turning universities into pawns of whichever party holds power.

Michael King, senior associate opinion editor at The Cavalier Daily, argues that UVA’s agreement with the Trump administration betrays the transparency expected of a public university. King contends that Interim President Mahoney signed a federal agreement — after rejecting the Trump “Compact” — without input or open debate, undermining community trust and shared governance. The piece warns that such secretive decision-making risks both university autonomy and public accountability.

In a guest column for the Virginia Gazette, Williamsburger and longtime journalist Jim Spencer argues that former UVA President Ryan’s letter reveals a partisan campaign to remove Ryan and alter the university’s leadership. Spencer cautions that the pressure campaign waged against UVA could become a model for imposing similar changes at major universities nationwide.

In an opinion column, David J. Toscano, seven-term Virginia House Minority Leader and former Charlottesville mayor, argues that Governor Youngkin’s push to dismantle DEI initiatives and his handling of President Ryan’s departure have fueled instability. He contends that Governor-elect Spanberger now faces the urgent task of restoring governance, transparency, and stability at the university.

The Virginia Mercury reports that the Virginia Supreme Court declined to hear Attorney General Jason Miyares’ appeal of a lower court order blocking Governor Youngkin’s recent board appointments at the University of Virginia. The court’s decision leaves in place a lower court order blocking Governor Youngkin’s nominees from serving on UVA’s Board of Visitors amid ongoing controversy over board legitimacy and partisanship, presidential succession, and political influence in university governance.

The Washington Post editorial board argues that federal pressure campaigns such as the one that led to former UVA President Ryan’s resignation, create political turmoil rather than meaningful reform in higher education. Highlighting the standoff between Virginia Governor-elect Spanberger and Governor Youngkin over the University’s leadership, the Post contends that lasting improvements to campus culture and viewpoint diversity are better achieved through institutional initiatives than by federal coercion or political maneuvering.

The New York Times reports on former UVA President Ryan’s letter likening his resignation to a “hostage situation,” claiming he was given four hours to step down or risk severe federal penalties for UVA. The article highlights the political and legal fallout of Ryan’s ouster, noting conflicting accounts of the events from the Justice Department, the board, and Ryan himself.

The Chronicle of Higher Education details former UVA President Ryan’s first comprehensive account of his resignation, as shared in a 12-page letter to the Faculty Senate. The article explores the internal dynamics among board members, the role of outside legal counsel, and Ryan’s personal struggle over whether to fight or step down.

In a guest column, George Mason University professors Judith Wilde and James Finkelstein—experts in higher education governance—defend Governor-elect Spanberger’s call to pause UVA’s presidential search until the Board of Visitors is fully and legally constituted. They argue that Spanberger’s concerns are grounded in sound governance and statutory requirements, and warn that Governor Youngkin’s criticism politicizes university oversight. Proceeding with the search amid legal and legitimacy questions, they caution, could undermine UVA’s reputation and future leadership.

The Washington Post reports that Governor-elect Spanberger formally requested UVA’s Board of Visitors to delay its presidential search until she takes office and fills board vacancies, citing concerns about the board’s legitimacy, statutory compliance, and public trust. Governor Youngkin swiftly rejected her request, accusing Spanberger of interference and defending the board’s actions. The exchange highlights ongoing political tensions over higher education governance in Virginia.

The New York Times reports that Governor-elect Spanberger’s victory is expected to reverse years of Republican-led efforts to reshape Virginia’s public universities. The article highlights faculty and legislative calls for Spanberger to revisit UVA’s federal “standstill” agreement and to appoint new university board members.

In a guest column, UVA law professor Josh Bowers denounces the university’s “standstill” agreement with the Department of Justice as a “rotten compromise” that undermines institutional autonomy and academic freedom. He warns that such a capitulation erodes core values of self-governance and transparency and urges university leaders to resist federal overreach.

In a guest column, James Finkelstein, professor emeritus of public policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, argues that UVA’s “standstill” agreement with the DOJ amounts to a quiet surrender of institutional independence and sets a troubling precedent for public universities nationwide. Finkelstein criticizes university leadership for capitulating to political pressure, writing that the deal threatens the core values of self-governance and free inquiry that define higher education.

Virginia Business reports that Democratic state Senate leaders have warned UVA’s agreement to end DEI initiatives under federal pressure may violate both state and federal law. Their letter calls for an independent constitutional analysis and greater legislative oversight, and questions Attorney General Miyares’ independence given his ties to the Trump administration.

The Cavalier Daily reports on the lawmaker letter calling on UVA to reconsider its agreement with the DOJ, arguing the deal is unconstitutionally coercive and violates federal court rulings. The story notes that, in their letter, Virginia Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell and Senator L. Louise Lucas criticizes the agreement’s ambiguity, lack of due process, and perceived capitulation to federal overreach, warning it undermines both university autonomy and state authority.

The Cavalier Daily reports that Interim President Mahoney and Board Rector Sheridan have defended UVA’s agreement with the DOJ in a letter to Charlottesville legislators. Their response follows sharp criticism from local lawmakers, who argue the agreement subjects UVA to “unprecedented federal control” and urge its reversal.

Local 29 News reports that UVA’s Faculty Senate has passed a resolution expressing “grave concerns” about the university’s agreement with the DOJ and its long-term implications. Faculty leaders are pressing for transparency from Interim President Mahoney and the Board, questioning both the forced resignation of former President Jim Ryan and the substantive changes required by the deal.

The Cavalier Daily details UVA Faculty Senate’s frustration over being excluded from negotiations on the DOJ agreement, which suspends but does not close federal investigations and requires struct adherence to DOJ guidance—guidance faculty note is only an “interpretation” of civil rights law. The piece highlights the faculty body’s resolution demanding that Interim President Mahoney and the Rector address them directly about the deal and the circumstances of former President Ryan’s departure.

In a critical op-ed, UVA Professor Kim Acquaviva argues that the university’s agreement with the DOJ sacrifices centuries of independence for federal oversight. The university now must comply with the DOJ’s expansive interpretation of civil rights law, lacks due process protections or appeal, and leaves all federal investigations merely “suspended”—not resolved. UVA’s president is now held hostage under penalty of perjury with no neutral fact-finder, and all reporting goes directly to the DOJ, not an independent monitor.

The Cavalier Daily reports that 40 UVA Law School faculty members sent a letter to university leaders hours before UVA rejected the Trump administration’s “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” arguing the proposal was unconstitutional and threatened First Amendment rights. Interim President Mahoney’s subsequent letter to the Department of Education formally rejected the Compact, citing concerns about integrity and independence.

The AP reports that UVA agreed to the Trump administration’s demands on admissions and hiring after months of federal pressure and the resignation of President Jim Ryan, who stepped down to avoid jeopardizing jobs and funding for the campus. Notably, the article details the role of America First Legal, a group created by Homeland Security Advisory Stephen Miller, in pressuring federal officials to take aggressive action against UVA’s diversity programs.

POLITICO highlights the stipulations of UVA’s deal with the Trump administration including a ban on DEI initiatives, adoption of new discrimination definitions, and compliance with controversial DOJ policies on transgender student inclusion.

The Guardian reports that UVA has agreed to the Trump administration’s demands on admissions and hiring following intense federal pressure, including threats to jobs, research funding, and student visas.

The Cavalier Daily details how UVA’s controversial Justice Department agreement suspends federal investigations into the University’s admissions and civil rights practices. Critics warn that the deal, reached under pressure, subjects UVA to ongoing federal scrutiny and grants the government broad authority to determine compliance and resume investigations at any time. Unlike other universities, UVA avoided financial penalties, but must now operate under restrictive oversight until at least 2028.

The New York Times details UVA’s agreement with the Trump administration which temporarily halts federal investigations into the university’s admissions and civil rights policies while fueling widespread concerns about academic freedom. The article outlines how the deal was reached under significant federal pressure and with little transparency, placing UVA’s decision in the context of broader efforts by the Trump administration to reshape higher education.

The Washington Post reports that UVA rejected the Trump administration’s offer of priority federal funding in exchange for signing the “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education.” The article features UVA’s concerns about academic integrity, free speech, and independence, as well as the strong faculty, student and legislative advocacy that influenced the decision.

The Cavalier Daily reports growing friction between UVA’s Faculty Senate and President Mahoney regarding the proposed compact with the Trump administration. Faculty leaders raise concerns about academic freedom, university governance, and the risks of external political influence in interviews, highlighting the deep divisions within the community as negotiations unfold.

Former Virginia Delegate David Ramadan examines how the Trump administration’s efforts to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in higher ed — using USA as a focal point — could inadvertently disadvantage conservative students and faculty.

Inside Higher Ed explores higher education legal experts’ three main takeaways from the seven letters the DOJ sent to UVA in April, which include: 1) The DOJ appears to be expanding the reach of the affirmative action ban that resulted from the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling; 2) The letters are “unprecedented in the breadth and urgency of their demands,” as opposed to typical oversight letters that would be narrowly focused on specific concerns; and 3) The administration is taking advantage of the fact that there is not a clear legal definition of DEI and what it extends to, so officials are acting on the president’s ideological definition.

Two days after Democratic state lawmakers cautioned the UVA Board of Visitors against starting the search for a new president, the BOV announced the formation of a special search committee. The committee “will be responsible for guiding the process of identifying and recommending candidates to the Board of Visitors,” the same format that is being used by the Virginia Military Institute after their president, the school’s first Black leader, was ousted under similar political circumstances.

Democratic state legislators in Virginia are calling on the UVA Board of Visitors to delay its search for a new president after Jim Ryan was forced out under pressure from the Trump administration. State Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D-Fairfax) suggested that delay could give Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger, the heavy favorite to win in November, the opportunity to name as many as “nine new members on a 16-member board.”

Since taking office in 2022, Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin has stocked the UVA Board of Visitors with former GOP lawmakers, Republican donors and members of the Jefferson Council. According to an Inside Higher Ed analysis, “boards at public institutions across [Virginia] are heavy with GOP donors, former lawmakers and Trump officials, and members with ties to conservative think tanks” who tend to clash with the institutions’ administration and faculty.

Clare Carter and Amy Reid write that the “ominous escalation of federal pressure of university leadership” in Virginia is undermining institutional autonomy. Without autonomy and academic freedom, universities could become “propaganda machines for their governments, given their extraordinary influence over knowledge, education, and the exchange of ideas.

Dr. Gregory Washington, President of George Mason University, is the latest Virginia university leader facing pressure over promoting campus diversity from conservative alumni groups and a Republican-appointed board. The campaign targeting Washington follows the ouster of VMI President Cedric Wins, who lost his contract in February following opposition from conservative alumni group the Spirit of VMI — and that of UVA President Jim Ryan.

Professor Bonnie Gordon, who has worked in the UVA Music Department for nearly two decades, discusses how President Jim Ryan was “pressured... into quitting” and draws a link to both the 2017 Unite the Right March in Charlottesville and the January 6, 2021, insurrection as reflecting an embrace of force to impose political outcomes. She concludes, “This administration will not stop with Jim Ryan, and they will not stop with UVA.”

The New York Times reports on Jim Ryan’s forced resignation, exploring the influence of the Jefferson Council and its ties to Gregory Brown, a Justice Department official and UVA alum tasked with rooting out DEI in higher education. Robert Holsworth, a longtime state political analyst and former Virginia Commonwealth University board member, said the Jefferson Council was pivotal in what he called a “coordinated” effort to unseat Ryan, and “wound up accumulating enough power in the Trump administration and the Department of Justice to be able to impact the university in a way that they could never have done without Trump’s victory.”

During an emergency Faculty Senate meeting, Professor Kim Acquaviva expressed disappointment with UVA’s Board of Visitors and Rector Rachel Sheridan, specifically noting the Justice Department’s involvement in pressuring the University to abandon its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, and Jim Ryan’s resignation.

The Cavalier Daily covers the July 11 Faculty Senate meeting and no-confidence vote, quoting associate professor Ian Mullins on faculty concerns about the Board: “We're concerned that they're trying to circumvent a democratic process for selecting our next leader.”

University of Virginia faculty passed a vote of no confidence in the school’s governing body, citing its failure to protect against “outside interference” by the Trump administration that led to the eventual resignation of University President Jim Ryan, and demanded answers from the Board of Visitors on members’ interactions with the Justice Department.

In an op-ed, Wahoos4UVA Advisory Council Co-Chairs Ann Brown and Chris Ford discuss how Jim Ryan’s legacy of thoughtful leadership is “being muscled aside by a bad-faith act of stunning executive overreach” and call on leaders in Congress and Virginia to “stand up and speak.”

Thomas Jefferson’s stated preference to have a “group of light-touch governors” — the Board of Visitors — make governance decisions for UVA stemmed from his fear of “energetic central government.” After a politically charged DOJ investigation resulted in the ouster of President Jim Ryan, it is a “no-brainer” that the University’s founder would be displeased.

Higher-education experts and UVA professors weigh in on President Ryan’s forced resignation, the clear vulnerabilities higher education faces under the Trump administration, and the "extralegal way” the DOJ and conservative groups went after President Ryan.

Acting Head of Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges calls Ryan’s forced ouster an "escalating threat.” In a letter to the editor, Ross Mugler says "Boards must stand with their presidents in the face of politicization, external interference and efforts to erode public trust. Higher education’s mission to advance knowledge, opportunity and democracy depends on strong, principled leadership and the courage to resist undue political influence.”

Teresa Sullivan, former President at the University of Virginia, called President Ryan’s leaving under pressure “a watershed moment in the history of the University” and urged faculty members to fight to preserve UVA’s reputation on the national and international stage.

Dennis Proffitt, Chair of the University of Virginia Retired Faculty Board, lamented that President Ryan, who was always “chasing the great and the good,” is yet “another casualty in the political war against higher education.”

Virginia State Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, D-Fairfax County, is signaling that Ryan’s departure “will trigger a wider confrontation with Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin over board appointments, legislative action in the General Assembly — and potentially action from Spanberger if she is elected governor.”

President of the AAUP Todd Wolfson called the “forced resignation” of UVA President Jim Ryan “an assault on a higher education system accessible to all, and thus on democracy itself.”

Former UVA counsel Timothy Heaphy criticizes the University's capitulation to federal pressure, writing: "Instead of presenting facts and law, the board waved the white flag of surrender. Mr. Ryan's resignation is a victory for intimidation and fear over the rule of law."

Cardinal News analyzes the unprecedented federal overreach in Ryan's ouster, questioning: "Is it wise to have a system where midlevel federal appointees can do what a governor can't — or at least shouldn't?" and warning this "sets a precedent" for future political interference in university governance.”

The New York Times reports on President Ryan's forced resignation, with Wahoos4UVA co-chair Ann Brown warning: "It would be a symbolic surrender of the university's autonomy and commitment to free inquiry that would send a chilling message: that public universities in Virginia serve political agendas, not the commonwealth."

Chris Ford, co-chair of Wahoos4UVA, said: ``We need to really identify all of the positive things that are going on at the University, all the positive things that President Ryan has done and is doing and continues to do, as opposed to allowing this negative misinformation to continue to just permeate the ethos.’’

Tom Stenzel, Alexandria, UVA parent, writes in strong support of UVA leadership: “I heard Jim Ryan at the freshman orientation, I knew this was a man of integrity who would lead the university well. Over the past four years as parents, we have seen the leadership of President Ryan in multiple occasions and venues, only confirming our respect and admiration.”

Former federal prosecutor and Chief Legal Analyst Tim Heaphy weighed in on UVA’s current leadership, saying “The vast majority of the people that I speak to, faculty, students, parents, alum, are very pleased with the direction of the university. These voices of dissent, I just think that they’re a very small kind of fringe group.

Keoni Vega, UVA Class of 2026 president, says to the Board of Visitors: “I urge you to act with restraint when listening to the loudest voices — especially those generations removed from this University and, most importantly, its current culture. To the incoming members of the Board, I ask that you recognize how deeply loved President Ryan is by the overwhelming majority of the University's students, staff, faculty and alumni.”

Members of UVA’s Retired Faculty Association assert that, under President Ryan’s leadership, UVA “…continues to flourish, and remains a robust, forward-thinking institution dedicated to building on Thomas Jefferson’s vision as a place to educate citizen-leaders.”